AIOps · 05 of 5
Adoption
Why AIOps, then assess, pilot, standardise and scale, with guardrails from day one.
How an engagement runs
- Assessbaseline and use cases
- Select & pilotlow risk, good data
- Visualise & compareoptions on cost
- Standardisearchitecture as code
- Scale & runoperated as a service
01
From reactive firefighting to proactive operations
The four pain points operations teams raise most, and what AIOps changes.
Reactive operations With AIOps
Slow incident resolution✕Manual troubleshooting across tools; users notice first.✓Signals correlated, known failures fixed by runbook, engineers start from evidence.
Alert noise✕A flood of alerts hides the critical ones.✓Alerts tuned to baselines and SLOs, grouped into incidents, each with a first action.
Hard root-cause analysis✕Complex dependencies, correlated by hand.✓Events, logs, metrics and changes correlated; AI proposes causes for engineers to confirm.
Rising operating cost✕Manual effort grows with every new system.✓Repeat work moves to automation and agents; people handle what needs judgement.
02
How an AIOps engagement runs
Strategy, implementation and operation; each phase ends at a gate.
- 01Assess
- Monitoring, alert volume, tickets, runbooks
- Place operations on the maturity scale
- 02Select & pilot
- A few use cases with good data, low risk
- Anomaly detection and correlation for one service
- 03Visualise & compare
- Dashboards for operations and pilot results
- Options compared on cost and complexity
- 04Standardise
- Reference architecture as code
- Runbooks and agents promoted through CI/CD
- 05Scale & run
- More services and service lines onboarded
- NGT runs the AI system, or hands it over
03
What gets automated first
Where work is repetitive, data is good and a mistake is cheap to undo.
04
Where are your operations today?
Three maturity levels from NGT's service offering. The assessment places you on this scale.
| Level | What it looks like | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| 01 Initiate | First tools, manual or basic; little standardisation or governance | Establishing the foundation |
| 02 Challenger | Repeatable processes, some automation and CI/CD, dashboards | Optimisation and standardisation |
| 03 Mastery | Integrated, automated, measurable; self-healing; organisation-wide | Strategic integration and innovation |
Guardrails
The questions this part raises, and their answers.
Only actions engineers approved for a known failure, that can be verified and rolled back: restarting a workload, adjusting resource limits, rolling back a deployment.
New or risky actions, and anything touching data or security, go to a person with the evidence.
SourcesNGT AI-First DevOps Transformation service offering (Oct 2026)NGT Services Offering v2.0 (Mar 2025)NGT Cloud Operation service offering v0.2 (Jan 2025)NGT Cloud, DevOps & SRE capability deck (Sep 2026)FHN AI Transformation Service (Aug 2025)FHN AI Service Introduction v0.8.5 (Nov 2025) and v0.9.3 (Mar 2026)NGT engineer profile sample, 38 CVs (2024–2026)
